S. Bank Trust Investor Reporting [step 113–115] and made open to the newest authors within earlier search
In line with our very own before dialogue, i also consider within our analyses neighborhood racial/cultural constitution and you will society change derived from census recordsposition is fairly simple, expressed within data of the % out-of Dark colored, Latina, Far eastern, and you may Light someone from the census region getting 2000 (for pre-market meltdown patterns) and you may 2010 (to have blog post-recession habits) (select Dining table dos).
Capturing neighborhood change using percentages has important limitations. Take, for example, a neighborhood in which the White percentage of the population decreased . In such a context, the minority population percentage increases by default even if the same number of minorities resided in the neighborhood during the period. A useful alternative, which we employ, is to tabulate the actual counts of each racial group from T1 and compare them to the counts of each group at T2 . There are two reasons why this strategy is useful. First, individuals are more likely to view racial/ethnic presence in terms of the overall size of minority groups (i.e., “in 2004 I had one black family on my street; now there are four black families”). Secondly, the count of each group is not mechanically related to the static group percentage since the difference in each group from T1 to T2 does not essentially impact their static percentage within the neighborhood. As a result, the correlation between proportional changes and static racial group composition should be low, and essentially lower than the correlation between static minority composition and percentage change of minority composition .