Smyth dissented) up against repairs from Oppenheimer’s clearance
My personal information about this new Oppenheimer circumstances comes not just out-of my head engagement involved, but also as a result of my character for a few ages just like the guidance to the AEC’s Division off Security and you can my personal personal personal relationships after that and because following with high AEC coverage authorities
Kenneth D. Nichols, the latest AEC’s General Director, necessary to the Fee the Gray Board’s findings and you will testimonial of May 27, 1954, be acknowledged, plus the Fee towards the June 28, 1954, granted their five-to-you to decision (Henry D. The new Oppenheimer instance produced higher personal debate at that time, as well as recent years could have been the main topic of multiple courses and you will blogs. Most commentators have translated the scenario because the good vendetta into element of Lewis L. Strauss, then-president of the AEC, otherwise from armed forces officials (usually the Air Push) facing Oppenheimer based on identification and you can/or coverage clashes. The most up-to-date analysis, from the Jack Holl, one of many official historians of your nuclear energy program try presented at American Historic Association’s general appointment inside December 1975.